View source for Woodstock Lane South in previous years

==2020==
=== Elm Farm ===
*{{CPC-planning|2020/1427|Telecommunication Mast, Elm Farm, Woodstock Lane South KT10 0TB|Telecommunications Notification - Existing 20.0 metre lattice tower to be extended by 2.0 metres, and an additional 3.0 metre high headframe (total height 24.80 meters). Existing Vodafone equipment to be relocated onto extended tower and headframe Removal of 3 No existing TEF antennas to be replaced with 3No. new antennas. Installation of 1No. GPS module, 12No. RRUs, equipment to be placed in existing cabin and ancillary equipment.|No Comment}} {{CPC-mtg-ref|PARISH COUNCIL planning meeting 16-JUL-20}}
[[File:Woodstock Lane Long Ditton.png|right|thumb|400px]]

* '''ii) Litter, Litter bins, Graffiti and Fly tipping'''
*:[[Woodstock Lane South]] continues to be a problem. {{CPC-mtg-ref|PARISH COUNCIL H&TE meeting 10-DEC-20}}

{{CPC-action|AP34 |Clerk to contact EBC, Kingston & SCC requesting what development is legitimate and approved along [[Woodstock Lane South]] and what development has not been approved and if not, what was happening to rectify. 1 The Oaks is managed by SCC and they confirmed that a refurbishment has been authorised but no additional dwellings beyond the existing 16 had been approved or are in progress. SCC carry out regular site surveys. Kingston are not responsible for any of the land along Woodstock Lane South. Their accountability falls the other side of the A3. There are three further traveller plots adjacent to 1 Oaks Traveller Site which all have legal approval and are owned privately by individuals. It was noted that one of these plots looked to have breached its legal agreement. '''DONE'''. Clerk has emailed details of suspected breach to Claygate’s Elmbridge Borough Cllrs. Cllr Mary Marshall confirmed she will investigate. {{CPC-mtg-ref|PARISH COUNCIL planning meeting 8-OCT-20}}}}

{{CPC-action|AP50| Clerk to speak to Environmental Team at EBC to understand what is being done to rectify the situation & then update the committee. Clerk to enquire on status of a budget that was allocated specifically to tackle the flytipping issue on Woodstock Lane. '''DONE'''. The Clerk received correspondence from Anthony Jeziorski, Head of Environmental Services at EBC who confirmed that they are working closely with SCC in their role as Highway Authority on initiatives to reduce the number of fly tipping and littering incidents, and to improve the appearance, along Woodstock Lane generally. In terms of seeking to improve the area, EBC are working with the County on a feasibility scheme for an improved cycle way, alongside investigating the effectiveness of the highway drainage systems. Work has started on planting a large number of trees on the section of land between Woodstock Lane North and [[Woodstock Lane South]]. They are also looking to procure a mobile enforcement camera for future targeted enforcement campaigns (which has been delayed by the Pandemic). They work closely with our Joint Waste Solution partners to clear the area regularly and, where there is evidence within the rubbish of whom it came from, then they do carry our formal actions and will aim to prosecute. If Cllrs, or residents, have any evidence then please pass to EBC who will investigate.}}
{{CPC-action|AP51|Clerk to get clarification from SCC on the rights of cyclist with the rise in use during the Covid-19 pandemic. '''DONE'''. SCC is working to help pedestrians and cyclists stay safe when they are out and about. An Active Travel Fund Consultation is underway by SCC which been circulated to Cllrs to input into. In addition, the Clerk received correspondence from Debbie Jones, Senior Countryside Access Officer at SCC, who confirmed cyclists have a statutory right to cycle on public bridleways. Under the Countryside Act 1968 (which gave them the right), it states that in exercising that right cyclists shall give way to pedestrians and persons on horseback. Cyclists do not have a statutory right to use public footpaths. Where they do so they are committing a trespass against the landowner, which is s civil rather than a criminal offence, unless there is a local byelaw or traffic regulation order in place. However, if there is no such legal order and the landowner acquiesces to the use by cyclists then no offence is caused.  {{CPC-mtg-ref|PARISH COUNCIL HT&E meeting 3-SEP-20}}
}}

{{CPC-action|AP34|Clerk to contact EBC, Kingston & SCC requesting what development is legitimate and approved along [[Woodstock Lane South]] and what development has not been approved and if not, what was happening to rectify. 1 The Oaks is managed by SCC and they confirmed that a refurbishment has been authorised but no additional dwellings beyond the existing 16 had been approved or are in progress. SCC carry out regular site surveys. Kingston are not responsible for any of the land along [[Woodstock Lane South]]. Their accountability falls the other side of the A3. There are 3 further traveller plots adjacent to 1 Oaks Traveller Site which all have legal approval and are owned privately by individuals. It was noted that one of these plots looked to have breached its legal agreement. '''OUTSTANDING'''. JB to confirm detail of potential legal breach to Clerk. Clerk to send letter detailing suspected breach to Claygate’s Elmbridge Borough Cllrs. {{CPC-mtg-ref|PARISH COUNCIL planning meeting 13-AUG-20}}
}}