Hermitage Close: Difference between revisions

From Claygate
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
[[File:Hermit.jpg]]
{| cellspacing="0" align="right"
|-
| align="center" colspan="9" style="vertical-align:bottom;"  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  | '''H I N C H L E Y   W O O D'''
|-
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  | '''E'''
|[[File:A6.png|link=a6]]
|[[File:B6.png|link=b6]]
|[[File:C6.png|link=c6]]
|[[File:D6.png|link=d6]]
|[[File:E6.png|link=e6]]
|[[File:F6.png|link=f6]]
|[[File:G6.png|link=g6]]
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |'''C'''
|-
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |'''S'''
|[[File:A5.png|link=a5]]
|[[File:B5.png|link=b5]]
|[[File:C5.png|link=c5]]
|[[File:D5.png|link=d5]]
|[[File:E5.png|link=e5]]
|[[File:F5.png|link=f5]]
|[[File:G5.png|link=g5]]
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |'''H'''
|-
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |'''H'''
|[[File:A4.png|link=a4]]
|[[File:B4.png|link=b4]]
|[[File:C4.png|link=c4]]
|[[File:D4.png|link=d4]]
| style="border: 5px solid red" | [[File:E4.png|link=e4]]
|[[File:F4.png|link=f4]]
|[[File:G4.png|link=g4]]
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |'''E'''
|-
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |'''E'''
|[[File:A3.png|link=a3]]
|[[File:B3.png|link=b3]]
|[[File:C3.png|link=c3]]
|[[File:D3.png|link=d3]]
|[[File:E3.png|link=e3]]
|[[File:F3.png|link=f3]]
|[[File:G3.png|link=g3]]
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |'''S'''
|-
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |'''R'''
|[[File:A2.png|link=a2]]
|[[File:B2.png|link=b2]]
|[[File:C2.png|link=c2]]
|[[File:D2.png|link=d2]]
|[[File:E2.png|link=e2]]
|[[File:F2.png|link=f2]]
|[[File:G2.png|link=g2]]
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |'''S'''
|-
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |
|[[File:A1.png|link=a1]]
|[[File:B1.png|link=b1]]
|[[File:C1.png|link=c1]]
|[[File:D1.png|link=d1]]
|[[File:E1.png|link=e1]]
|[[File:F1.png|link=f1]]
|[[File:G1.png|link=g1]]
|  style="background:#e6e6e6;"  |'''N'''
|-
| align="center" colspan="9" style="vertical-align:top;"  style="background:#e6e6e6;" | '''O X S H O T T'''
|-
|}
 
[[File:Hermit.jpg|350px|left]]
<div style="clear: both"></div>
== 2024 Planning Applications ==


=== № 1 ===
=== № 1 ===
{{plan-app|<!-- 1. APPLICATION NUMBER -->2024/1133|<!-- 2. ADDRESS -->1 Hermitage Close|<!-- 3. PROPOSAL --> Part two/part single storey side extension, two-storey front extension, single-storey rear extension, hip-to-gable roof extension with rear dormer}}
{{plan-app|<!-- 1. APPLICATION NUMBER -->2024/1133|<!-- 2. ADDRESS -->1 [[Hermitage Close]]|<!-- 3. PROPOSAL --> Part two/part single storey side extension, two-storey front extension, single-storey rear extension, hip-to-gable roof extension with rear dormer}}
 
=== № 13 ===
{{property| [[File:1 Hermitage Close.png]] |
{{plan-app-comm|<!-- 1. APPLICATION NUMBER -->2024/2200|<!-- 2. ADDRESS -->Pavillion House 13 [[Hermitage Close]]|<!-- 3. PROPOSAL --> Tree Preservation Order EL:258 - Reduce hornbeams screen by 3m and shape. Cut back neighbouring side to match works on garden side. This application is exactly in line with all previous applications to purely maintain these healthy trees. Neighbour at no.14 has just had his trees cut back to enable more light to enter the garden and maintain a healthy level for the protected trees- this is the same kind of application as has been done on many occasions over the years.|<!-- 4. COMMENTS -->Tree Wardens}}
* {{cpc-value| <!-- property --> 1 Hermitage Close, KT10 0HH| <!-- date data retrieved --> 13-FEB-21| <!-- Zoopla estimate -->£1,094,000| <!-- Most recent selling price --> £675,000| <!-- Most recently sold in --> AUG-12}}
*{{CPC-planning|2020/2885|1 [[Hermitage Close]]|Two-storey front extension, two-storey rear infill extension, single-storey side extension and hip-to-gable roof extension with rear dormer windows following demolition of existing side projection.|no objection}}
 
One member of the public spoke citing that the planning application had been improved since its 2019 submission. However, they still had three concerns namely loss of light source, loss of privacy and planning inconsistency. They felt the development was overbearing. They welcomed a site visit and a topological survey and would like validation that the planning policy light rules had been met. They had concerns that the size and position of the dormers would mean that they would lose privacy within their patio and lawn. They raised that their own planning application in 2016 had received a comment from CPC stating that their own dormer required obscured glass and non-opening to protect
the privacy of 1 Hermitage Close.


A further member of the public spoke citing that the proposed three dormers would look directly into their garden and as such they would also incur loss of privacy. They suggested alternative solutions like Velux (similar to neighbouring properties) or obscured, non-opening set back windows in the dormers. This would be consistent with 3 [[Common Road]] planning application awarded with these requirements back in 2016. A final member of the public spoke stating that the Parish Council had not objected to the dormers in the prior planning application in 2019. Pre-application advice received stated that the picture window in neighbouring property is north facing so would not affect light
[https://emaps.elmbridge.gov.uk/ebc_planning.aspx?requesttype=parsetemplate&template=PlanningDetailsTab.tmplt&basepage=ebc_planning.aspx&Filter=%5eAPPLICATION_NUMBER%5e=%272024/2200%27&history=b617b10b282c484b9b0507b53e8ff05f&appno:PARAM=2024/2200&address:PARAM=Pavillion%20House%2013%20Hermitage%20Close%20Claygate%20Esher%20Surrey%20KT10%200HH&easting:PARAM=516212&northing:PARAM=163711 {{sc|view details}}]
entry, the development would not be affecting privacy of neighbours and that the dormers would not alter their privacy and that a neighbouring property has already got a large dormer window with balcony.


Claygate Parish Council voted to submit a no objection but to add a comment regarding the consideration of obscured glass in the dormer windows to preserve neighbour privacy. The
{{plan-app-decid|<!-- 1. APPLICATION NUMBER -->2024/2200
Committee informed residents that they can make their comments directly with EBC via their website on all planning applications. {{CPC-mtg-ref|PARISH COUNCIL planning meeting 3-DEC-20}}
|<!-- 2. ADDRESS -->Pavilion House, 13 [[Hermitage Close]]
}}
|<!-- 3. PROPOSAL --> Tree Preservation Order EL:258 - Reduce hornbeams screen by 3m and shape. Cut back neighbouring side to match works on garden side. This application is exactly in line with all previous applications to purely maintain these healthy trees. Neighbour at no.14 has just had his trees cut back to enable more light to enter the garden and maintain a healthy level for the protected trees- this is the same kind of application as has been done on many occasions over the years.
|<!-- 4. CPC VERDICT --> No Objections. With Comments: To make sure that the reduction to 6M as applied as per the previous comments.
|<!-- 5. EBC DECISION -->Grant Consent [with 2 x Conditions]}}


=== № 6 ===
[https://emaps.elmbridge.gov.uk/ebc_planning.aspx?requesttype=parsetemplate&template=PlanningDetailsTab.tmplt&basepage=ebc_planning.aspx&Filter=%5eAPPLICATION_NUMBER%5e=%272024/2200%27&history=74e8f9aadbd243218464ca1c152360db&appno:PARAM=2024/2200&address:PARAM=Pavillion%20House%2013%20Hermitage%20Close%20Claygate%20Esher%20Surrey%20KT10%200HH&easting:PARAM=516212&northing:PARAM=163711 {{sc|view details}}]
{{property| [[File:6 Hermitage Close.png]] |
* {{cpc-value| <!-- property --> 6 Hermitage Close, KT10 0HH| <!-- date data retrieved --> 9-FEB-21| <!-- Zoopla estimate -->£1,200,000| <!-- Most recent selling price --> £980,000| <!-- Most recently sold in --> FEB-15}}
*{{CPC-planning|2020/3187|6 Hermitage Close, KT10 0HH|Side and rear dormer windows and front roof light.|No Comment}}  {{CPC-mtg-ref|PARISH COUNCIL planning meeting 5-JAN-21}}
}}


=== № 8 ===
== Further Information ==
{{property| [[File:8 Hermitage Close.png]] |
* [[Hermitage Close in previous years]]
* {{cpc-value| <!-- property --> 8 Hermitage Close, KT10 0HH| <!-- date data retrieved --> 13-FEB-21| <!-- Zoopla estimate --> £1,119,000| <!-- Most recent selling price --> not known| <!-- Most recently sold in --> not known}}
*{{CPC-planning|2020/2619|8 Hermitage Close, KT10 0HH|Tree Preservation Order EL: 258 - Crown reduce 10 X Hornbeam and Beech by 4-5m.|No objection. CPC would like to comment that we would appreciate if all cuts be made at suitable junctions as previous works left some trees looking unattractive.}} {{CPC-mtg-ref|PARISH COUNCIL planning meeting 3-DEC-20}}
}}

Latest revision as of 20:20, 24 November 2024

H I N C H L E Y   W O O D
E C
S H
H E
E S
R S
N
O X S H O T T

2024 Planning Applications

№ 1

ADDRESS: 1 Hermitage Close
APPLICATION NUMBER: 2024/1133
PROPOSAL: Part two/part single storey side extension, two-storey front extension, single-storey rear extension, hip-to-gable roof extension with rear dormer

№ 13

ADDRESS: Pavillion House 13 Hermitage Close
APPLICATION NUMBER: 2024/2200
PROPOSAL: Tree Preservation Order EL:258 - Reduce hornbeams screen by 3m and shape. Cut back neighbouring side to match works on garden side. This application is exactly in line with all previous applications to purely maintain these healthy trees. Neighbour at no.14 has just had his trees cut back to enable more light to enter the garden and maintain a healthy level for the protected trees- this is the same kind of application as has been done on many occasions over the years.
COMMENTS: Tree Wardens

VIEW DETAILS


ADDRESS: Pavilion House, 13 Hermitage Close

APPLICATION NUMBER: 2024/2200
PROPOSAL: Tree Preservation Order EL:258 - Reduce hornbeams screen by 3m and shape. Cut back neighbouring side to match works on garden side. This application is exactly in line with all previous applications to purely maintain these healthy trees. Neighbour at no.14 has just had his trees cut back to enable more light to enter the garden and maintain a healthy level for the protected trees- this is the same kind of application as has been done on many occasions over the years.
CPC VERDICT: No Objections. With Comments: To make sure that the reduction to 6M as applied as per the previous comments.

EBC VERDICT: Grant Consent [with 2 x Conditions]

VIEW DETAILS

Further Information