Template:Latest Minutes: Difference between revisions

From Claygate
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
|-
|-
|Despite at least one applicant dropping out, five good candidates presented themselves for public interviews in the co-option process — given that the Reform candidate in the Surrey election is campaigning against 20 mph proposals, the Parish Council decides not to discuss the matter — the Parish Council decides to overlook its one-grant-per-year rule to enable second bites of the cherry by both the CVA and the church — the Parish Council flails against government proposals for Neighbourhood Area Committees in the unitary reorganisation — and agrees to set up a public meeting to debate Elmbridge's re-structuring of the Day Centres.
|Despite at least one applicant dropping out, five good candidates presented themselves for public interviews in the co-option process — given that the Reform candidate in the Surrey election is campaigning against 20 mph proposals, the Parish Council decides not to discuss the matter — the Parish Council decides to overlook its one-grant-per-year rule to enable second bites of the cherry by both the CVA and the church — the Parish Council flails against government proposals for Neighbourhood Area Committees in the unitary reorganisation — and agrees to set up a public meeting to debate Elmbridge's re-structuring of the Day Centres.
|Can Hare Lane be made safer? — the Environment committee is looking into extending the K3 bus route into Coverts Road hopes for funds to resurface Hare Lane from the railway bridge to The Swan this financial year — Should the garden triangle where Stevens Lane meets Red Lane be removed?
|Two of the working group leaders resign, citing work commitments —  
|-
|-
|}
|}

Revision as of 07:04, 8 August 2025

LATEST PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES: A QUICK SUMMARY
Paridh Council 24th July Environment Committee 17th July
Despite at least one applicant dropping out, five good candidates presented themselves for public interviews in the co-option process — given that the Reform candidate in the Surrey election is campaigning against 20 mph proposals, the Parish Council decides not to discuss the matter — the Parish Council decides to overlook its one-grant-per-year rule to enable second bites of the cherry by both the CVA and the church — the Parish Council flails against government proposals for Neighbourhood Area Committees in the unitary reorganisation — and agrees to set up a public meeting to debate Elmbridge's re-structuring of the Day Centres. Two of the working group leaders resign, citing work commitments —